Skip to content

Column Selection Considerations in Compact Capillary Liquid Chromatography

Samuel W. Foster¹, Elisabeth P. Gates², Paul A. Peaden², Serguei V. Calugaru², W. Raymond West², Milton L. Lee²˒³, James P. Grinias¹
¹Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, United States
²Axcend LLC, Provo, UT, 84604, United States
³Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, United States

Abstract

Recent years have seen significant advances in compact, portable capillary LC instrumentation. This study explores the performances of several commercially available columns within the pressure and flow limits of both the columns and one of these compact LC instruments. The commercially available compact capillary LC system with UV-absorbance detector used in this study is typically operated using columns in the 0.15–0.3 mm internal diameter (i.d.) range. Efficiency measurements (i.e., theoretical plates, N) for six columns with i.d.s in this range and of varying lengths and pressure limits, packed with stationary phases of different particle diameters and morphologies, were made using a mixture of standard alkylphenones. Kinetic plot comparisons between columns that vary by one (or more) of these parameters are described, along with calculated kinetic performance and Knox-Saleem limits. These theoretical performance descriptions provide insight into optimal operating conditions when using capillary LC systems. Based on kinetic plot evaluation of available capillary columns in the 0.2–0.3 mm i.d. range with a conservative upper pressure limit of 330 bar packed with superficially porous particles, a 25 cm column could generate ∼47,000 plates in 7.85 min when operated at 2.4 µL/min. For comparison, more robust 0.3 mm i.d. columns (packed with fully porous particles) that can be operated at higher pressures than can be provided by the pumping system (conservative pump upper pressure limit of 570 bar), a ∼20 cm column could generate nearly 40,000 plates in 5.9 min if operated at 6 µL/min. Across all capillary LC columns measured, higher pressure limits and shorter columns can provide the best throughput when considering both speed and efficiency.

 

Introduction

Reduction in solvent usage is a primary goal of green analytical chemistry [1], [2], [3], [4], and for liquid chromatography (LC), this can be most easily achieved through a reduction in mobile phase consumption [5,6]. With analytical-scale high pressure LC (i.e., HPLC), this has been achieved by reducing column internal diameter (i.d.) from 4.6 mm down to 3.0 mm [7]. In ultra-high pressure HPLC (UHPLC), where 2.1 mm i.d. columns have been typically used because of performance losses that can occur due to viscous friction at pressures exceeding 400 bar, 1.5 mm i.d. columns have recently demonstrated comparable separation performance while reducing mobile phase flow rates by approximately 50% [8,9]. However, to truly achieve the greatest reduction in mobile phase consumption, capillary- and nano-scale LC columns are most effective because of their dramatically reduced flow rates [6].

With the recent advent of integrated, compact capillary LC instruments [10], [11], [12], [13], which simplify operation and minimize extra-column volume, there is now greater potential to broaden the adoption of capillary-scale LC techniques. These systems have recently been used for the characterization of biocides [14], cannabinoids [13,15], polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) [16], perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) [17], pharmaceutical compounds [13,18], and illicit drug compounds [13,19], as well as for on-line reaction monitoring [11,18]. To enhance UV-absorbance detector sensitivity when using capillary LC, flow cells with long pathlengths have been developed [20,21]. However, longer pathlength, which leads to greater detector flow cell volume, can reduce chromatographic performance due to increased extra-column band broadening. Placing an on-capillary light-emitting diode (LED) UV-absorption detector directly adjacent to the column outlet frit adds minimal extra-column volume, but limits the pathlength to the capillary column i.d. (e.g., 150 µm for a 150 µm i.d. column) [22].

In this report, a re-designed version of an on-capillary LED UV-absorption detector that uses similar optics but integrates a z-cell design that increases the pathlength to 1.2 mm is described. To accommodate the increase in detector volume, column internal diameters of 200 µm and 300 µm were investigated. Specifically, the effects of column length, column i.d., and particle size/morphology on separation performance were measured within the limitations of each column maximum operating pressure limit, the LC instrument maximum pressure limit, and the balance between mobile phase flow rate and analysis time. For such comparisons, the kinetic plot approach with emphasis on the overall kinetic performance limit (KPL) for a given set of operating conditions was adopted [23]. These results provide guidance on column selection within the given parameters afforded by modern compact capillary LC instrumentation.

 
 

Full Text

This publication is featured on axcendcorp.com because Axcend and/or one of its products was referenced. The full version of this article is hosted by the publisher. Viewing or downloading the complete text on their site may require a subscription or institutional login.

 

Originally published in Journal of Chromatography A 2023, 1701, 464067; doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464067.